A
couple of years ago it seemed that despite the overall increase in
power platform for smartphones, one remain immutable - the size and
resolution of the display. At that time it was thought that the most reasonable diagonal display smartphone is 4.3 inches with a resolution of 800 x 480. Someone
even called this monstrous screen and claimed that more than 3.5 inches
diagonal for a significant part of the users do not need. However,
in recent years the situation has changed, and HTC is a smartphone with
a 5-inch diagonal display with a resolution of 1920 x 1080. But whether such a device is the world?
Each revised YouHTC have their own opinion on the matter. There are among us fans of the "shovel" and those who do not accept their existence, despite the huge sales of flagship smartphone Samsung. However, we will leave a shaky topic diagonal and take up the other option - resolution. We all met HTC J butterfly, and in particular - to display FullHD-unanimous "Wow", but here McLeish Fisher (Michael Fisher) from Pocketnow have their own opinion on that.Let's face it, his opinion is better to consider the so-called trolling or even "pounce", but some sound grain in it. The first idea is that by creating a device with a large screen with high resolution, we set it in a big long and heavy rechargeable battery. Or force users to live near a power outlet. With a diagonal of everything is obvious - the bigger it is, the greater the number of cells must be nourished. In fact, with a resolution of the situation is similar - with its increase, we are increasing the number of cells. Of course, a little less than the cells themselves, and perhaps the current supplied to them need a little less, but the overall consumption is still growing.On the second negative aspect FullHD-screen as you might guess - processing power. The processor and graphics cards have to handle high-resolution textures, which consequently requires more powerful hardware. Michael gives the example of the iPad 3 and Retina-display when the buyers of the new device did not see any increase in the speed of the device and games for him.J butterfly screen compare to iPhone 5Finally, and, again, the obvious argument against FullHD display smartphone - users still do not see the difference between FullHD and HD Ready. As a big fan of technology Apple, Michael has full confidence in Steve Jobs and his phrase that their screen with Retina perfect and exceeds the number of pixels per inch, the maximum resolution that the eye sees. Recall: Retina-display has a 326 ppi. By the way, my first smartphone with a resolution of more than Retina HTC introduced last year - this is for Verizon HTC Rezound with 342 ppi. However, the new J butterfly surpassed all: its display is 440 pixels per inch. Michael says that in such a clear picture is unnecessary. However, the concept of Retina - marketing clean water, and measure the human eye perceives the image in pixels correctly.In the end I would like to give their comments on the brief account of Mr. Fisher's thoughts. As I said above, they have a grain of truth, but I would say all of the above price of progress. Remember when the first dual-core processor and qHD-display appeared in Android-smartphones, ardent fans of Apple and Windows Phone said it was all of no use to their great system - it works for them and allowing enough. However, now and in the smartphone Apple, and installed fresh Windows Phone chips with two cores, and a display resolution in expensive solutions much larger than WVGA. I think this idea will be a good end of the article.
Each revised YouHTC have their own opinion on the matter. There are among us fans of the "shovel" and those who do not accept their existence, despite the huge sales of flagship smartphone Samsung. However, we will leave a shaky topic diagonal and take up the other option - resolution. We all met HTC J butterfly, and in particular - to display FullHD-unanimous "Wow", but here McLeish Fisher (Michael Fisher) from Pocketnow have their own opinion on that.Let's face it, his opinion is better to consider the so-called trolling or even "pounce", but some sound grain in it. The first idea is that by creating a device with a large screen with high resolution, we set it in a big long and heavy rechargeable battery. Or force users to live near a power outlet. With a diagonal of everything is obvious - the bigger it is, the greater the number of cells must be nourished. In fact, with a resolution of the situation is similar - with its increase, we are increasing the number of cells. Of course, a little less than the cells themselves, and perhaps the current supplied to them need a little less, but the overall consumption is still growing.On the second negative aspect FullHD-screen as you might guess - processing power. The processor and graphics cards have to handle high-resolution textures, which consequently requires more powerful hardware. Michael gives the example of the iPad 3 and Retina-display when the buyers of the new device did not see any increase in the speed of the device and games for him.J butterfly screen compare to iPhone 5Finally, and, again, the obvious argument against FullHD display smartphone - users still do not see the difference between FullHD and HD Ready. As a big fan of technology Apple, Michael has full confidence in Steve Jobs and his phrase that their screen with Retina perfect and exceeds the number of pixels per inch, the maximum resolution that the eye sees. Recall: Retina-display has a 326 ppi. By the way, my first smartphone with a resolution of more than Retina HTC introduced last year - this is for Verizon HTC Rezound with 342 ppi. However, the new J butterfly surpassed all: its display is 440 pixels per inch. Michael says that in such a clear picture is unnecessary. However, the concept of Retina - marketing clean water, and measure the human eye perceives the image in pixels correctly.In the end I would like to give their comments on the brief account of Mr. Fisher's thoughts. As I said above, they have a grain of truth, but I would say all of the above price of progress. Remember when the first dual-core processor and qHD-display appeared in Android-smartphones, ardent fans of Apple and Windows Phone said it was all of no use to their great system - it works for them and allowing enough. However, now and in the smartphone Apple, and installed fresh Windows Phone chips with two cores, and a display resolution in expensive solutions much larger than WVGA. I think this idea will be a good end of the article.
http://www.youhtc.ru
No comments:
Post a Comment