Many expected that HTC will pick up the idea of Samsung is about to release its own and fablet HTC dlx. However
dlx was "normal" smartphone with a huge screen, which first came out in
Japan, and now appeared in the U.S. operator under the name HTC Droid
DNA. Although
he fablet Galaxy Note II from Samsung belong to different classes of
devices, people if you want to buy top class device will still compare
it to, so do a little comparison we.
We begin with similar specifications. Both monsters have 2 GB of RAM, the main camera with a resolution of 8 megapixels, BSI-backlit wide-angle lenses and flashes. But
display devices are markedly different: in this SGN2 Super HD
AMOLED-matrix with PenTile, which has a diagonal of 5.5 inches and a
resolution of 1280 x 720. Screen
HTC Droid DNA is built on new technology Super LCD 3, he has a diagonal
of 5 inches and a resolution of 1920 x 1080 (FullHD). Of
the journalists claimed that the difference between the screens with a
resolution of 720p and 1080p on a mobile device will not be noticeable. However
when used in real terms showed that the human eye sees the difference -
the fonts and icons on the screen Droid DNA is much clearer and more
enjoyable. Despite
some criticism of the Super LCD 3, the technology for proper display of
color and brightness clearly outperforms the AMOLED. In this competition, new screens from HTC wins, if you are willing to sacrifice 0.5 inches and advanced features, "pen" input.
Inside the "smartphone" quad-core processors are installed. However, they differ even in architecture cores: in Note II is Exynos 4 Quad (4412) with a frequency of 1.6 GHz, where the kernels are made for architecture Cortex-A9, set in Droid DNA Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) with a frequency of 1.5 GHz and a core Krait that give noticeable gains in some operations. Diverse and integrated SoC accelerators: a processor from Samsung is the ARM Mali-400 MP4, U ultramodern Qualcomm Adreno 320.Naturally, most of all the distinction between architecture can be seen in the synthetic benchmarks. In classics Quadrant HTC Droid DNA gaining 7944 points, from Samsung fablet considerably less - 6186 points. AnTutu Benchmark again demonstrates the superiority of the smartphone HTC - 14,514 against 13,529 points. In multiplatform Linpack benchmark with a single-threaded Droid DNA holds 191.838 MFLOPS (million floating-point operations per second), Samsung Galaxy Note II only 64,438. But an even greater superiority over the common Krait architecture Cortex-A9 shows multithreading - 464,646 against 152.916 MFLOPS. In 2012 SmartBench Droid DNA gaining 4677 points, 4644 - in Note II. Unfortunately, the game points are unknown, but is visually apparent that the HTC much faster than the competitor. But in the SunSpider, tests the processing speed of JavaScript, the new product by HTC for Verizon does the job for 1148.3 ms, while the Galaxy Note II it takes 1041.8 ms. Apparently, in a somewhat slow down browsing Droid DNA modification blame HTC.
Visually, most of the programs and games run at the same speed, the camera application and Samsung, and HTC will start immediately. But in the browser Note II and the truth a little bit faster (but at separate, "no comparison" use significantly practicable will not).In both devices installed Android 4.1 with original covers. Surprisingly, the traditionally more "heavy» HTC Sense (and draw more in higher resolution) works quite smoothly, "lags" are absent.Every man to his own taste, but overall, HTC Droid DNA better in the hand - it is more narrow and monolithic. Yes, and used in the body of the smartphone glossy plastic materials nicer Galaxy Note II. By the way, DNA is slightly thicker competitor, but by the design of the back of the visually seems and feels in the hand of a thin!We must remember that these are devices of different classes. If the user is interested in painting, the clear choice for him - fablet from Samsung. But if performance is above features pen input, the preference is clearly falls on the leader of the tests - HTC Droid DNA.
http://www.youhtc.ru
We begin with similar specifications. Both monsters have 2 GB of RAM, the main camera with a resolution of 8 megapixels, BSI-backlit wide-angle lenses and flashes. But
display devices are markedly different: in this SGN2 Super HD
AMOLED-matrix with PenTile, which has a diagonal of 5.5 inches and a
resolution of 1280 x 720. Screen
HTC Droid DNA is built on new technology Super LCD 3, he has a diagonal
of 5 inches and a resolution of 1920 x 1080 (FullHD). Of
the journalists claimed that the difference between the screens with a
resolution of 720p and 1080p on a mobile device will not be noticeable. However
when used in real terms showed that the human eye sees the difference -
the fonts and icons on the screen Droid DNA is much clearer and more
enjoyable. Despite
some criticism of the Super LCD 3, the technology for proper display of
color and brightness clearly outperforms the AMOLED. In this competition, new screens from HTC wins, if you are willing to sacrifice 0.5 inches and advanced features, "pen" input.Inside the "smartphone" quad-core processors are installed. However, they differ even in architecture cores: in Note II is Exynos 4 Quad (4412) with a frequency of 1.6 GHz, where the kernels are made for architecture Cortex-A9, set in Droid DNA Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) with a frequency of 1.5 GHz and a core Krait that give noticeable gains in some operations. Diverse and integrated SoC accelerators: a processor from Samsung is the ARM Mali-400 MP4, U ultramodern Qualcomm Adreno 320.Naturally, most of all the distinction between architecture can be seen in the synthetic benchmarks. In classics Quadrant HTC Droid DNA gaining 7944 points, from Samsung fablet considerably less - 6186 points. AnTutu Benchmark again demonstrates the superiority of the smartphone HTC - 14,514 against 13,529 points. In multiplatform Linpack benchmark with a single-threaded Droid DNA holds 191.838 MFLOPS (million floating-point operations per second), Samsung Galaxy Note II only 64,438. But an even greater superiority over the common Krait architecture Cortex-A9 shows multithreading - 464,646 against 152.916 MFLOPS. In 2012 SmartBench Droid DNA gaining 4677 points, 4644 - in Note II. Unfortunately, the game points are unknown, but is visually apparent that the HTC much faster than the competitor. But in the SunSpider, tests the processing speed of JavaScript, the new product by HTC for Verizon does the job for 1148.3 ms, while the Galaxy Note II it takes 1041.8 ms. Apparently, in a somewhat slow down browsing Droid DNA modification blame HTC.
Visually, most of the programs and games run at the same speed, the camera application and Samsung, and HTC will start immediately. But in the browser Note II and the truth a little bit faster (but at separate, "no comparison" use significantly practicable will not).In both devices installed Android 4.1 with original covers. Surprisingly, the traditionally more "heavy» HTC Sense (and draw more in higher resolution) works quite smoothly, "lags" are absent.Every man to his own taste, but overall, HTC Droid DNA better in the hand - it is more narrow and monolithic. Yes, and used in the body of the smartphone glossy plastic materials nicer Galaxy Note II. By the way, DNA is slightly thicker competitor, but by the design of the back of the visually seems and feels in the hand of a thin!We must remember that these are devices of different classes. If the user is interested in painting, the clear choice for him - fablet from Samsung. But if performance is above features pen input, the preference is clearly falls on the leader of the tests - HTC Droid DNA.
http://www.youhtc.ru
No comments:
Post a Comment